On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 02:41:21PM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> Patch:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg01587.html
>
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 10:39:44AM +0100, Dominik Vogt wrote:
> > g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C no longer fail with Glibc-2.18 or
> > newer since this commit:
> >
> > 2014-08-01 Zifei Tong <zifeit...@gmail.com>
> >
> > * libsupc++/atexit_thread.cc (HAVE___CXA_THREAD_ATEXIT_IMPL):
> > Add
> > _GLIBCXX_ prefix to macro.
> >
> > git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@213504
> > 138bc75d-0d04-0410-96
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg02091.html
> >
> > So, is it time to remove the xfail from the test case?
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> >
> > * g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C: Remove xfail.
>
> > >From 0b0abbd2e6d9d8b6857622065bdcbdde31b5ddb0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Dominik Vogt <v...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 09:54:07 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] Remove xfail from thread_local-order2.C.
> >
> > This should work with Glibc-2.18 or newer.
> > ---
> > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C | 1 -
> > 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C
> > b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C
> > index f8df917..d3351e6 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tls/thread_local-order2.C
> > @@ -2,7 +2,6 @@
> > // that isn't reverse order of construction. We need to move
> > // __cxa_thread_atexit into glibc to get this right.
> >
> > -// { dg-do run { xfail *-*-* } }
> > // { dg-require-effective-target c++11 }
> > // { dg-add-options tls }
> > // { dg-require-effective-target tls_runtime }
> > --
> > 2.3.0
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany
