On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Dominique d'Humières <domi...@lps.ens.fr> wrote: >> This above is pretty clearly a typo. The attached patch committed as >> obvious r239706. > Could you please provide a test failing before r239706 and succeeding after > it? >
I will work on that - it seems to be harder to exhibit this issue than I would've thought. I'm finding myself reconsidering this piece of the original patch and its implications. In related news, I found and fixed another bug while attempting to exhibit this bug: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-08/msg00126.html --- Fritz Reese
