On 4 August 2016 at 00:33, Michael Collison <michael.colli...@arm.com> wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
>
> I validated using qemu as well. the results are listed here:
>
>
> http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-validation/gcc-test-patches/237091-bugzilla-69663-v27/report-build-info.html
>
>
> I'm going to investigate and see if I can determine what the discrepancy is.
>
Hi Michael,
This validation was against trunk @r237091, I used r239008 as reference.
It's possible that your patch conflicts with changes committed to trunk
since your validation.
Christophe
> ________________________________
> From: Christophe Lyon <christophe.l...@linaro.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 5:59:48 AM
> To: Michael Collison
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; James Greenhalgh; Kyrylo Tkachov; nd
> Subject: Re: [ARM][PATCH] Add support for overflow add, sub, and neg
> operations
>
> On 2 August 2016 at 10:13, Michael Collison <michael.colli...@arm.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch improves code generations for builtin arithmetic overflow
>> operations for the arm backend. As an example for a simple test case such
>> as:
>>
>> int
>> fn3 (int x, int y, int *ovf)
>> {
>> int res;
>> *ovf = __builtin_sadd_overflow (x, y, &res);
>> return res;
>> }
>>
>> Current trunk at -O2 generates
>>
>> fn3:
>> @ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
>> @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
>> @ link register save eliminated.
>> cmp r1, #0
>> mov r3, #0
>> add r1, r0, r1
>> blt .L4
>> cmp r1, r0
>> blt .L3
>> .L2:
>> str r3, [r2]
>> mov r0, r1
>> bx lr
>> .L4:
>> cmp r1, r0
>> ble .L2
>> .L3:
>> mov r3, #1
>> b .L2
>>
>> With the patch this now generates:
>>
>> adds r0, r0, r1
>> movvs r3, #1
>> movvc r3, #0
>> str r3, [r2]
>> bx lr
>>
>> Ok for trunk?
>>
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> I've run validations with your patch, and I am seeing several failures
> during tests execution:
> http://people.linaro.org/~christophe.lyon/cross-validation/gcc-test-patches/239008-bugzilla-69663-upstream-final/report-build-info.html
>
> I'm using qemu 2.6.0.
>
> Did you run validation on actual HW? It could be a qemu bug, but I
> haven't tried to manually reproduce the problem yet.
>
> Christophe.
>
>
>> 2016-07-27 Michael Collison <michael.colli...@linaro.org>
>> Michael Collison <michael.colli...@arm.com>
>>
>> * config/arm/arm-modes.def: Add new condition code mode CC_V
>> to represent the overflow bit.
>> * config/arm/arm.c (maybe_get_arm_condition_code):
>> Add support for CC_Vmode.
>> (arm_gen_unlikely_cbranch): New function to generate common
>> rtl conditional branches for overflow patterns.
>> * config/arm/arm-protos.h: Add prototype for
>> arm_gen_unlikely_cbranch.
>> * config/arm/arm.md (addv<mode>4, add<mode>3_compareV,
>> addsi3_compareV_upper): New patterns to support signed
>> builtin overflow add operations.
>> (uaddv<mode>4, add<mode>3_compareC, addsi3_compareV_upper):
>> New patterns to support unsigned builtin add overflow operations.
>> (subv<mode>4, sub<mode>3_compare1): New patterns to support signed
>> builtin overflow subtract operations,
>> (usubv<mode>4): New patterns to support unsigned builtin subtract
>> overflow operations.
>> (negvsi3, negvdi3, negdi2_compare, negsi2_carryin_compare): New
>> patterns
>> to support builtin overflow negate operations.
>> * gcc.target/arm/builtin_saddl.c: New testcase.
>> * gcc.target/arm/builtin_saddll.c: New testcase.
>> * gcc.target/arm/builtin_uaddl.c: New testcase.
>> * gcc.target/arm/builtin_uaddll.c: New testcase.
>> * gcc.target/arm/builtin_ssubl.c: New testcase.
>> * gcc.target/arm/builtin_ssubll.c: New testcase.
>> * gcc.target/arm/builtin_usubl.c: New testcase.
>> * gcc.target/arm/builtin_usubll.c: New testcase.
>
