On 08/01/2016 01:58 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> After changing the expected number of loop iterations, IVOPTS decides to
>> pick up an another IV.
>> Bin agreed that the test-case still makes sense with changed expectation.
>>
>> Ready to be installed?
>
> Hmm, but do all targets replace the exit test? I think you want to
> allow either no "Replacing"
> or just "Replacing exit test" - not sure how to encode that in a regex.
>
> Richard.
Well, the test-case is run just on { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && lp64
with -m64, thus I guess the exit condition should be always replaced.
Martin
>
>> Martin
