On 07/20/2016 09:35 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
I have reported it as PR71947. Could you help me point out how to fix this ?Not record both equivalences. This might break the testcase it was introduced for (obviously). Which is why I CCed Jeff for his opinion.
It's on my todo list. I'm still catching up from my PTO last month.It'll certainly regress the testcase that was introduced when we recorded both equivalences.
jeff
