On 19 July 2016 at 18:47, Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/17/2016 09:52 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote: >> >> + if (is_vla) >> + gcc_assert (warn_vla_limit > 0); >> + if (!is_vla) >> + gcc_assert (warn_alloca_limit > 0); >> >> if-else ? Or perhaps: > > Shouldn't really matter, except perhaps in a -O0 compilation. Though I > think else-if makes it slightly clearer.
Of course, I mentioned it because of clarity. It was difficult to distinguish !i versus (i in my screen and I had to stop to read it again. Cheers, Manuel.
