> On Wed, 6 Jul 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > > > Jan Hubicka <hubi...@ucw.cz> writes: > > > > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK? > > > > > > > > * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-14.c: new testcase. > > > > > > FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-14.c scan-tree-dump-not ivopts "Overflowness > > > wrto loop niter:\tOverflow" > > > > Aha, this is wrong version of testcase. The scan-tree-dump-not doesn't match > > until we resolve decreasing unsigned iv variables as non-overlapping. I > > will > > test dropping that pattern for now. Sorry for that. > > But did you test the patch? You should have noticed this during your > own testing...
Yeah, I managed to keep unrelated change to ivopts in the tree that made the testcase to pass. Sorry for that. Honza > > Richard.
