Ping. If this is OK for both branches (or at least one) would you
rather prefer separate patch?
2016-06-23 9:37 GMT+02:00 Jakub Sejdak <jakub.sej...@phoesys.com>:
> How about backporting this to gcc-6 and gcc-5?
>
> 2016-06-21 22:10 GMT+02:00 Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com>:
>> On 06/15/2016 08:22 AM, Kuba Sejdak wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it ok for trunk? If possible, If possible, please merge it also to
>>> GCC-6 and GCC-5 branches.
>>>
>>> 2016-06-15 Jakub Sejdak <jakub.sej...@phoesys.com>
>>>
>>> * config.gcc: Add support for arm*-*-phoenix* targets.
>>> * config/arm/t-phoenix: New.
>>> * config/phoenix.h: New.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> gcc/ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
>>> gcc/config.gcc | 11 +++++++++++
>>> gcc/config/arm/t-phoenix | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> gcc/config/phoenix.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 79 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 gcc/config/arm/t-phoenix
>>> create mode 100644 gcc/config/phoenix.h
>>>
>>
>>> +arm*-*-phoenix*)
>>> + tm_file="dbxelf.h elfos.h arm/unknown-elf.h arm/elf.h arm/bpabi.h"
>>> + tm_file="${tm_file} newlib-stdint.h phoenix.h"
>>> + tm_file="${tm_file} arm/aout.h arm/arm.h"
>>> + tmake_file="${tmake_file} arm/t-arm arm/t-bpabi arm/t-phoenix"
>>
>> Do you really need dbxelf.h? We're trying to get away from stabs, so unless
>> there's a strong need, avoid dbxelf.h :-)
>>
>> OK for the trunk with dbxelf.h removed.
>>
>> jeff
>
>
>
> --
> Jakub Sejdak
> Software Engineer
> Phoenix Systems (www.phoesys.com)
> +48 608 050 163
--
Jakub Sejdak
Software Engineer
Phoenix Systems (www.phoesys.com)
+48 608 050 163
