>>> On 01.07.16 at 15:36, <bschm...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 07/01/2016 10:21 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Just like gas, which has recently learned to reject such initializers, >> gcc shouldn't accept such either. >> --- >> v2: Use dg-require-named-sections. >> >> gcc/ >> 2016-07-01 Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> >> * varasm.c (get_variable_section): Validate initializer in >> named .bss-like sections. >> >> gcc/testsuite/ >> 2016-07-01 Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> >> >> * gcc.dg/bss.c: New. > > Looks ok, except why the empty dg-options string in the testcase?
Because I've seen in it that way in various other test cases (and yes, yet others don't have it). I had to decide for one of the variants, and if it's not required (nor wanted) I can certainly drop it. Jan
