On Wednesday 29 June 2016 21:58:40 Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 29/06/16 13:49 -0700, Mike Stump wrote: > >Please include the libstdc++ list, they don't all read the other list. > > And the documentation clearly says (in two places) that all libstdc++ > patches must go to the libstdc++ list.
Oops my apologize, I did not think of libstdc++ has a separate component than GCC. I'll keep that in mind for next time. Committed now. Best regards, Thomas
