On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Martin Liška <mli...@suse.cz> wrote: > On 06/29/2016 12:27 PM, Martin Liška wrote: >> On 06/29/2016 11:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote: >>> So what was your original reason to pursue this? >>> >>> Richard. >> >> Agree with you that handling the option during inlining is a bit overkill. >> I can live with just marking the option as Optimize, which will fix reported >> PR. >> >> Sending simplified version 2. >> >> Ready for trunk? >> Martin >> > > Adding missing patch.
Ok. Might want to backport the inline_call hunk to all affected branches. Richard. > M.
