I plan to commit this patch as obvious and simple. Regression tested on x86-64. I will provide two test cases from the PR
Regards, Jerry 2016-06-28 Jerry DeLisle <jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org> PR fortran/71686 * scanner.c (gfc_next_char_literal): Only decrement nextc if it is not NULL. diff --git a/gcc/fortran/scanner.c b/gcc/fortran/scanner.c index 6a7a5b68..be9c5091 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/scanner.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/scanner.c @@ -1416,7 +1416,8 @@ restart: { if (in_string) { - gfc_current_locus.nextc--; + if (gfc_current_locus.nextc) + gfc_current_locus.nextc--; if (warn_ampersand && in_string == INSTRING_WARN) gfc_warning (OPT_Wampersand, "Missing %<&%> in continued character " @@ -1427,7 +1428,10 @@ restart: /* Both !$omp and !$ -fopenmp continuation lines have & on the continuation line only optionally. */ else if (openmp_flag || openacc_flag || openmp_cond_flag) - gfc_current_locus.nextc--; + { + if (gfc_current_locus.nextc) + gfc_current_locus.nextc--; + } else { c = ' ';