On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, Martin Sebor wrote: > Looks fine to me. The bit-field handling should be explained > in the manual. Though useful, it's unusual enough that I don't > think people will expect it (there have been bug reports or > questions in the past about the C handling of bit-fields from > users familiar with the C++ semantics).
And at least once bug for C++ (70733) that was closed on the basis of C semantics where I don't see that closure as correct under C++ semantics (I haven't verified whether the bug report is correct, however). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
