On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > Ping. This patch > > <https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg02131.html> is pending > > review (for the non-x86-specific parts). > The inliner bits looks fine to me. Of course it is easy to check whether the > function actually calls floor/ceil and thus is affected by this flag. Do you > expect this to matter? I.e. do you expect that codebases will mix both values > of this flag in one project and expect cross-module inlining to work with LTO?
I don't expect much use of this option until -fno-fp-int-builtin-inexact is implied by -std=c2x / -std=gnu2x (supposing TS 18661-1 gets integrated for the next major revision of the C standard - not the bug-fix revision due first). At that point people might start using those options (I'd still expect people to be consistent within one project, but maybe not for separately maintained libraries). -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
