Hello Jakub, On 01 Jun 22:17, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Hi! > > This is the last pattern I'm aware of that didn't have any v/Yv constraints > that ought to be changed (there perhaps are others which have v/Yv in some > of the alternatives, but not in all the ones that could use it). > > The testcases show what are the changes useful for. > > Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk? OK.
-- Thanks, K
