On 25 May 2016 at 16:55, Jonathan Wakely <jwak...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 24/05/16 19:49 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote: >> >> On 24 May 2016 at 19:35, Ville Voutilainen <ville.voutilai...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Slight tweak. The avoidance of _NotSameTuple wasn't quite correct for >>> the templates that >>> take const tuple<_UElements...>& or tuple<_UElements...>&& instead of >>> const _UElements&... >>> or _UElements&&... >>> >>> This patch introduces a new helper alias to cover those cases and >>> takes it into use where appropriate. >>> All tests pass, but I don't have any sane tests to verify this tweak. >> >> >> >> ..and I don't need to be quite so round-about in the new helper, it >> can just check !is_same >> instead of doing a nested _TC call. Changelog the same as in the previous >> one. > > > OK for trunk - thanks. >
Ack, I will do the mechanics in the forthcoming days, but here's a question: what do we want to do about this patch for the gcc6-branch? I fully appreciate being careful and not committing to the branch right now, but presumably this patch is a candidate for backporting to gcc6.
