On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:18 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Oh, target_flags is only a 32bit integer :(. Is there a reason it >>>> can't be extended to HOST_WIDE_INT, as is the case with >>>> ix86_isa_flags? >>> >>> target_flags is generic, not target specific. I want to limit my >>> change to x86 backend and -mgeneral-regs-only doesn't need >>> to use target_flags . >> >> I have thrown together a quick patch that defines target_flags as >> HOST_WIDE_INT. >> >> (Patch still needs a small correction, so opth-gen.awk will emit >> HOST_WIDE_INT_1 for MASK_* defines, have to go now, but I was able to >> compile functional x86_64-apple-darwin15.5.0 crosscompiler.) > > And here is attached complete (but untested!!) patch that should "just > work"(TM). >
-mgeneral-regs-only doesn't need to use target_flags and it shouldn't use target_flags. -- H.J.
