On Tue, 2016-05-17 at 18:49 -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:01:32PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > This implements the libgccjit support for must-tail-call via > > a new: > > gcc_jit_rvalue_set_bool_require_tail_call > > API entrypoint. > > It seems to me like that's not a great name, the rvalue and bool > parts > are just about the argument types, not what the function does. > Wouldn't > gcc_jit_set_call_requires_tail_call be better?
Maybe. I was thinking of it from the point of view of methods; it's effectively a method on gcc_jit_rvalue. The "set_bool" is for consistency with various gcc_jit_context_ entrypoints. FWIW, I've committed the patch as-is; all of the must-tail-call patches are now in trunk, as of r236531.
