On 05/20/2016 07:17 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
The below passes testing. There are a few minor changes wrt your suggestions (I think we want & as hint;
I disagree; if what the user wanted was a function pointer, there's no reason to use decltype(auto) over plain auto. Much more likely that they meant to capture the (possibly reference) result of a call.
spacing consistent with typeck2.c; DECL_NAME doesn't seem necessary). I wondered if we want to tighten the condition consistently with the wording of the error message, thus patchlet *2 below, which of course also passes testing.
No, I don't think there's any way to deduce function type without the initializer having function type.
So, the first patch is OK with the message changed to (). Jason
