On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 10:59:18AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Sounds good. I will commit later with your wording.
Unfortunately, the new testcase fails e.g. on i?86-*-* or on powerpc*.
On i?86-*-* (without -msse) I actually see 2 different issues, one is
extra -Wpsabi warnings, and another is the dump scan, the optimization isn't
used there at all if we don't have SSE HW.
Surprisingly, on powerpc* the only problem is the extra warnings about ABI
compatibility, but the scan matches, even if there is no vector support.
Similarly on s390* too (and there are no warnings even).
So, dunno if we should limit the scan-tree-dump-times only to a few selected
arches (e.g. those where we add dg-additional-options for, plus some where
it is known to work without additional options, like perhaps aarch64*-*-*,
maybe spu*-*-*, what else?).
2016-05-20 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR tree-optimization/29756
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-6.c: Add -Wno-psabi -w to dg-options.
Add -msse2 for x86 and -maltivec for powerpc.
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-6.c.jj 2016-05-20 12:44:33.000000000
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vector-6.c 2016-05-20 13:17:08.730168547
+0200
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
/* { dg-do compile } */
-/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-ccp1" } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fdump-tree-ccp1 -Wno-psabi -w" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-msse2" { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-maltivec" { target powerpc_altivec_ok } } */
typedef int v4si __attribute__((vector_size (4 * sizeof (int))));
Jakub
