On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:11 AM, Segher Boessenkool
<seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:17:32AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 6:09 PM, Segher Boessenkool
>> <seg...@kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>> > Make new functions make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq, and
>> > make_epilogue_seq.
>> >
>> > Tested as in the previous patch; is this okay for trunk?
>> >
>> >
>> > Segher
>> >
>> >
>> > 2016-05-16 Segher Boessenkool <seg...@kernel.crashing.org>
>> >
>> > * function.c (make_split_prologue_seq, make_prologue_seq,
>> > make_epilogue_seq): New functions, factored out from...
>> > (thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns): Here.
>> >
>>
>> It breaks x86:
>
> Are you sure it is this patch causing it? As noted, it was tested on x86.
>
I am pretty sure. How did you test it on x86? What do you get with
# make check-c++ RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=ctor*.C --target_board='unix{-m32,}'"
--
H.J.
