On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: > While not a bug according to the language of the C++ standard, this > causes dozens of warnings when building GCC with clang, and there is > not benefit of mixing struct and class like this. > > Mike, when I had a similar case a while ago you sounded pretty > supportive of this kind of change. Would you be fine to pre-approve > such changes?
Can we recommend that clang disable this warning by default instead? Or use an option flag to disable the warning while compiling gcc? Thanks, Andrew > > Gerald > > 2016-05-15 Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> > > * wide-int.h: Change fixed_wide_int_storage from class to struct. > > Index: wide-int.h > =================================================================== > --- wide-int.h (revision 236255) > +++ wide-int.h (working copy) > @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ > HOST_WIDE_INT *VAL = RESULT.write_val () > > template <typename T> class generic_wide_int; > -template <int N> struct fixed_wide_int_storage; > +template <int N> class fixed_wide_int_storage; > class wide_int_storage; > > /* An N-bit integer. Until we can use typedef templates, use this instead. > */
