On Fri, 13 May 2016, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Thanks. So, this would seem to suggest that BITS_PER_UNIT in memcmp/memcpy > expansion is more accurate than a plain 8, although pedantically we might want > to use CHAR_TYPE_SIZE? Should I adjust my patch to use the latter or leave > these parts as-is?
I'd say use CHAR_TYPE_SIZE. -- Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com
