On 05/11/16 12:02, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
I conceptually agree to that. (If we're serious about that, then we can remove more code, such as the legacy libgomp entry point itself -- a "missing symbol: [...]" is still vaguely better than a SIGSEGV.) Yet, what I fixed here, is just what Jakub and Nathan agreed upon in <http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C20150924084034.GC1847%40tucnak.redhat.com%3E>:
Well, that email appears to be from september, and this patch is more complex than the linker versioning script I had anticipated. If it's taken this long to create a patch, either it's very hard, or it's not a priority. Given 6.1 is released, it also seems to have failed to catch the train.
nathan
