On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 12:35 -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 08:58 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 10:26:01AM -0600, Kelvin Nilsen wrote:
> > Do we really want to #define short words like "darn"? If this is already > > set in stone, so be it. > > I don't think we do, and in any case altivec.h would not be the place to > do it. darn is not a vector instruction. > > For these, just having __builtin_darn* be the available interfaces will > be fine. > Agreed, I don't think we need a fancy short names for this builtin which will be infrequently used. The __builtin_darn name is enough. Peter
