Hi Richard,


+             int last = ops.length () - 1;
+             bool negate_result = false;

Do

   oe &last = ops.last ();


Done.


+             if (rhs_code == MULT_EXPR
+                 && ops.length () > 1
+                 && ((TREE_CODE (ops[last]->op) == INTEGER_CST

and last.op here and below

+                      && integer_minus_onep (ops[last]->op))
+                     || ((TREE_CODE (ops[last]->op) == REAL_CST)
+                         && real_equal (&TREE_REAL_CST
(ops[last]->op), &dconstm1))))


Done.

Here the checks !HONOR_SNANS () && (!HONOS_SIGNED_ZEROS ||
!COMPLEX_FLOAT_TYPE_P)
are missing.  The * -1 might appear literally and you are only allowed
to turn it into a negate
under the above conditions.

Done.


+               {
+                 ops.unordered_remove (last);

use ops.pop ();

Done.

+                 negate_result = true;

Please move the whole thing under the else { } case of the ops.length
== 0, ops.length == 1 test chain
as you did for the actual emit of the negate.


I see your point. However, when we remove the (-1) from the ops list, that intern can result in ops.length becoming 1. Therefore, I moved the the following if (negate_result), outside the condition.



+                 if (negate_result)
+                   {
+                     tree tmp = make_ssa_name (TREE_TYPE (lhs));
+                     gimple_set_lhs (stmt, tmp);
+                     gassign *neg_stmt = gimple_build_assign (lhs, NEGATE_EXPR,
+                                                              tmp);
+                     gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_for_stmt (stmt);
+                     gsi_insert_after (&gsi, neg_stmt, GSI_NEW_STMT);
+                     update_stmt (stmt);

I think that if powi_result is also built you end up using the wrong
stmt so you miss a

                         stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (lhs);

Yes, indeed. This can happen and I have added this.


here.  Also see the new_lhs handling of the powi_result case - again
you need sth
similar here (it's handling looks a bit fishy as well - this all needs
some comments
and possibly a (lot more) testcases).

So, please do the above requested changes and verify the 'lhs' issues I pointed
out by trying to add a few more testcase that also cover the case where a powi
is detected in addition to a negation.  Please also add a testcase that catches
(-y) * x * (-z).


Added this to the testcase.

Does this look better now?

Thanks,
Kugan


2016-04-23  Kugan Vivekanandarajah  <kug...@linaro.org>

         PR middle-end/40921
         * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr40921.c: New test.

gcc/ChangeLog:

2016-04-23  Kugan Vivekanandarajah  <kug...@linaro.org>

         PR middle-end/40921
         * tree-ssa-reassoc.c (try_special_add_to_ops): New.
         (linearize_expr_tree): Call try_special_add_to_ops.
         (reassociate_bb): Convert MULT_EXPR by (-1) to NEGATE_EXPR.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr40921.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr40921.c
index e69de29..3a5a23a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr40921.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr40921.c
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2  -fdump-tree-optimized -ffast-math" } */
+
+unsigned int foo (unsigned int x, unsigned int y, unsigned int z)
+{
+      return x + (-y * z * z);
+}
+
+float bar (float x, float y, float z)
+{
+      return x + (-y * z * z);
+}
+
+float bar2 (float x, float y, float z)
+{
+      return x + (-y * z * z * 5.0f);
+}
+
+float bar3 (float x, float y, float z)
+{
+      return x + (-y * x * -z);
+}
+
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "_* = -y_" 0 "optimized" } } */
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
index 4e1251b..1df6681 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
@@ -4112,6 +4112,45 @@ acceptable_pow_call (gimple *stmt, tree *base, 
HOST_WIDE_INT *exponent)
   return true;
 }
 
+/* Try to derive and add operand entry for OP to *OPS.  Return false if
+   unsuccessful.  */
+
+static bool
+try_special_add_to_ops (vec<operand_entry *> *ops,
+                       enum tree_code code,
+                       tree op, gimple* def_stmt)
+{
+  tree base = NULL_TREE;
+  HOST_WIDE_INT exponent = 0;
+
+  if (TREE_CODE (op) != SSA_NAME)
+    return false;
+
+  if (code == MULT_EXPR
+      && acceptable_pow_call (def_stmt, &base, &exponent))
+    {
+      add_repeat_to_ops_vec (ops, base, exponent);
+      gimple_set_visited (def_stmt, true);
+      return true;
+    }
+  else if (code == MULT_EXPR
+          && is_gimple_assign (def_stmt)
+          && gimple_assign_rhs_code (def_stmt) == NEGATE_EXPR
+          && !HONOR_SNANS (TREE_TYPE (op))
+          && (!HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (TREE_TYPE (op))
+              || !COMPLEX_FLOAT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (op))))
+    {
+      tree rhs1 = gimple_assign_rhs1 (def_stmt);
+      tree cst = build_minus_one_cst (TREE_TYPE (op));
+      add_to_ops_vec (ops, rhs1);
+      add_to_ops_vec (ops, cst);
+      gimple_set_visited (def_stmt, true);
+      return true;
+    }
+
+  return false;
+}
+
 /* Recursively linearize a binary expression that is the RHS of STMT.
    Place the operands of the expression tree in the vector named OPS.  */
 
@@ -4126,8 +4165,6 @@ linearize_expr_tree (vec<operand_entry *> *ops, gimple 
*stmt,
   bool binrhsisreassoc = false;
   enum tree_code rhscode = gimple_assign_rhs_code (stmt);
   struct loop *loop = loop_containing_stmt (stmt);
-  tree base = NULL_TREE;
-  HOST_WIDE_INT exponent = 0;
 
   if (set_visited)
     gimple_set_visited (stmt, true);
@@ -4163,24 +4200,10 @@ linearize_expr_tree (vec<operand_entry *> *ops, gimple 
*stmt,
 
       if (!binrhsisreassoc)
        {
-         if (rhscode == MULT_EXPR
-             && TREE_CODE (binrhs) == SSA_NAME
-             && acceptable_pow_call (binrhsdef, &base, &exponent))
-           {
-             add_repeat_to_ops_vec (ops, base, exponent);
-             gimple_set_visited (binrhsdef, true);
-           }
-         else
+         if (!try_special_add_to_ops (ops, rhscode, binrhs, binrhsdef))
            add_to_ops_vec (ops, binrhs);
 
-         if (rhscode == MULT_EXPR
-             && TREE_CODE (binlhs) == SSA_NAME
-             && acceptable_pow_call (binlhsdef, &base, &exponent))
-           {
-             add_repeat_to_ops_vec (ops, base, exponent);
-             gimple_set_visited (binlhsdef, true);
-           }
-         else
+         if (!try_special_add_to_ops (ops, rhscode, binlhs, binlhsdef))
            add_to_ops_vec (ops, binlhs);
 
          return;
@@ -4220,14 +4243,7 @@ linearize_expr_tree (vec<operand_entry *> *ops, gimple 
*stmt,
   linearize_expr_tree (ops, SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (binlhs),
                       is_associative, set_visited);
 
-  if (rhscode == MULT_EXPR
-      && TREE_CODE (binrhs) == SSA_NAME
-      && acceptable_pow_call (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (binrhs), &base, &exponent))
-    {
-      add_repeat_to_ops_vec (ops, base, exponent);
-      gimple_set_visited (SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (binrhs), true);
-    }
-  else
+  if (!try_special_add_to_ops (ops, rhscode, binrhs, binrhsdef))
     add_to_ops_vec (ops, binrhs);
 }
 
@@ -4980,6 +4996,22 @@ reassociate_bb (basic_block bb)
                  && flag_unsafe_math_optimizations)
                powi_result = attempt_builtin_powi (stmt, &ops);
 
+             operand_entry *last = ops.last ();
+             bool negate_result = false;
+             if (rhs_code == MULT_EXPR
+                 && ops.length () > 1
+                 && ((TREE_CODE (last->op) == INTEGER_CST
+                      && integer_minus_onep (last->op))
+                     || ((TREE_CODE (last->op) == REAL_CST)
+                         && real_equal (&TREE_REAL_CST (last->op), &dconstm1)))
+                 && !HONOR_SNANS (TREE_TYPE (lhs))
+                 && (!HONOR_SIGNED_ZEROS (TREE_TYPE (lhs))
+                     || !COMPLEX_FLOAT_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (lhs))))
+               {
+                 ops.pop ();
+                 negate_result = true;
+               }
+
              /* If the operand vector is now empty, all operands were 
                 consumed by the __builtin_powi optimization.  */
              if (ops.length () == 0)
@@ -5042,6 +5074,18 @@ reassociate_bb (basic_block bb)
                      gsi_insert_after (&gsi, mul_stmt, GSI_NEW_STMT);
                    }
                }
+
+             if (negate_result)
+               {
+                 stmt = SSA_NAME_DEF_STMT (lhs);
+                 tree tmp = make_ssa_name (TREE_TYPE (lhs));
+                 gimple_set_lhs (stmt, tmp);
+                 gassign *neg_stmt = gimple_build_assign (lhs, NEGATE_EXPR,
+                                                          tmp);
+                 gimple_stmt_iterator gsi = gsi_for_stmt (stmt);
+                 gsi_insert_after (&gsi, neg_stmt, GSI_NEW_STMT);
+                 update_stmt (stmt);
+               }
            }
        }
     }

Reply via email to