Hi again,
On 12/04/2016 15:53, Jason Merrill wrote:
Let's go with the first patch.
What about this one? Today I returned to it, and technically it still
represents a regression in gcc-4_9-branch and gcc-5-branch, but
personally I'd rather not backport the fix: in release-mode we just emit
an additional "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" at the end of a
rather long series of diagnostic messages, the first ones meaningful,
the last redundant anyway and the snippet triggering it seems
particularly broken to me...
Thanks,
Paolo.
