On Wed, 2016-05-04 at 18:43 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > OnSamuel Thibault, on Wed 04 May 2016 17:29:48 +0200, wrote: > > > > > - -- From: /usr/include/unistd.h __getpagesize or > > > getpagesize?? > > > - function Get_Page_Size return int; > > > + -- From: /usr/include/i386-gnu/bits/shm.h __getpagesize or > > > getpagesize?? > > > + function Get_Page_Size return size_t; > > > + function Get_Page_Size return Address; > > > > > > Why using size_t and Address? Other OSes use int, and the > > > prototype for > > > getpagesize is returning int. > > > > > > Also, don't use the __ versions of the glibc functions, they are > > > internal aliases, the API is without __. > > > > > > I thought I did change that, but apparently not. I did such a change, > but it was probably somewhere else. Please submit your patch upstream > and to Debian.
No it was not somewhere else. I did change that, see Debian bug #811063. I even built gcc-6 to make sure everything was OK. And still it did not get into the updated patch, strange. May I comment on Debian way of apt-get source gcc-*: Doing that does not unpack the sources, neither does it apply the patches, you have to unpack and patch before you can change sources and update patches. Iv'e patched the sources several times and still find that the updated patches are not included in the next build. Really confusing. Thanks!
