> On 04/29/16 11:08, Aaron Conole wrote: > > >Perhaps I've poorly explained what I want. I want to be able to pipe > >gcov error messages to a different file for post-processing / reporting > >elsewhere. I don't want them mixed with the application's messages. Do > >you think this kind of generic flexibility is not a good thing, when it > >comes at such little cost? > > Thanks for clarifying your rationale. I'm not convinced, but I'm > not (yet) saying no. > > Jan, do you have any thoughts?
I can imagine this to be useful - if your application is outputting stuff into error output during its training run, it may be quite disturbing having gcov diagnostics randomly mixed in. (in particular I run myself into cases missing the diagnostics) So I am fine with the feature. Honza > > nathan
