On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:51:11PM +0200, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> If that is all ok and we just have a really odd cfg, then your patch is ok
> with a better comment as to which situations can cause the problem.

Thanks, committed rev 235825.

diff --git a/gcc/ira.c b/gcc/ira.c
index a38e67e..269a190 100644
--- a/gcc/ira.c
+++ b/gcc/ira.c
@@ -3742,6 +3742,22 @@ combine_and_move_insns (void)
          if (use_insn == BB_HEAD (use_bb))
            BB_HEAD (use_bb) = new_insn;
 
+         /* We know regno dies in use_insn, but inside a loop
+            REG_DEAD notes might be missing when def_insn was in
+            another basic block.  However, when we move def_insn into
+            this bb we'll definitely get a REG_DEAD note and reload
+            will see the death.  It's possible that update_equiv_regs
+            set up an equivalence referencing regno for a reg set by
+            use_insn, when regno was seen as non-local.  Now that
+            regno is local to this block, and dies, such an
+            equivalence is invalid.  */
+         if (find_reg_note (use_insn, REG_EQUIV, NULL_RTX))
+           {
+             rtx set = single_set (use_insn);
+             if (set && REG_P (SET_DEST (set)))
+               no_equiv (SET_DEST (set), set, NULL);
+           }
+
          ira_reg_equiv[regno].init_insns
            = gen_rtx_INSN_LIST (VOIDmode, new_insn, NULL_RTX);
          bitmap_set_bit (cleared_regs, regno);

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM

Reply via email to