On 04/22/2016 06:11 AM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:12:48PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/20/2016 12:22 AM, tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org wrote:
From: Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org>
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-04-19 Trevor Saunders <tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org>
* var-tracking.c (struct adjust_mem_data): Make side_effects a vector.
(adjust_mems): Adjust.
(adjust_insn): Likewise.
(prepare_call_arguments): Likewise.
---
gcc/var-tracking.c | 30 +++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/var-tracking.c b/gcc/var-tracking.c
index 9f09d30..7fc6ed3 100644
--- a/gcc/var-tracking.c
+++ b/gcc/var-tracking.c
@@ -926,7 +926,7 @@ struct adjust_mem_data
bool store;
machine_mode mem_mode;
HOST_WIDE_INT stack_adjust;
- rtx_expr_list *side_effects;
+ auto_vec<rtx> side_effects;
};
Is auto_vec what you really want here? AFAICT this object is never
destructed, so we're not releasing the memory. Am I missing something here?
it is destructed, auto_vec has a destructor, there for adjust_mem_data
has a destructor since it has a field with a destructor.
adjust_mem_data is always on the stack so the compiler deals with making
sure the destructor is called when it goes out of scope.\
Duh :-)
OK for the trunk. It looks like Bernd and others are handling the bulk
of these, so I'll step aside.
jeff
