On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 2:35 AM, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote:
>> > On Mon, 25 Apr 2016, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:47 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:18 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:51 PM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> Tested on Linux/x86-64.  OK for trunk?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> +  /* FIXME: Since the CSE pass may change dominance info, which isn't
>> >> >>> +     expected by the fwprop pass, call free_dominance_info to
>> >> >>> +     invalidate dominance info.  Otherwise, the fwprop pass may crash
>> >> >>> +     when dominance info is changed.  */
>> >> >>> +  if (TARGET_64BIT)
>> >> >>> +    free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
>> >> >>> +
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Please resolve the above problem first, target-dependent sources are
>> >> >> not the place to apply band-aids for middle-end problems. The thread
>> >> >> with the proposed fix died in [1].
>> >> >>
>> >> >> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-03/msg00143.html
>> >> >
>> >> > free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS) has been called in other
>> >> > places to avoid this middle-end issue.   I don't know when the 
>> >> > middle-end
>> >> > will be fixed.  I don't think this target optimization should be 
>> >> > penalized by
>> >> > the middle-end issue.
>> >>
>> >> Let's ask Richard if he is OK with the workaround...
>> >
>> > Well, it's ultimately your call (it's a workaround in the target).
>>
>> Oh well, ...
>>
>> > Of course I'd like to see the underlying issue fixed and the
>> > workarounds in "other places" be removed.
>>
>> ... then at least a reference to a relevant PR should be added to a
>> FIXME comment.
>
> HJ, can you please open a bug with 1) a testcase, 2) a patch to revert
> the workaround so it shows the ICE and 3) a pointer to the ml thread
> with your preliminary analysis?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70807

-- 
H.J.

Reply via email to