On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 08/19/2011 02:04 AM, Richard Guenther wrote: >> So make sure that __cpu_indicator initially has a conservative correct >> value? I'd still prefer the constructor-in-libgcc option - if only because >> then the compiler-side is much simplified. >> > > Err, I thought __cpu_indicator was a function, not data. > > I think we need to discuss this more... >
In glibc, we export function __get_cpu_features as a private interface used for IFUNC. We can do something similar with libgcc very carefully. -- H.J.
