Hi Segher,
Here's the fix for the obvious pasto separated out. CCing Richi and
Jakub as I'd appreciate release manager approval to include this in
gcc-6-branch. This fixes some cases where built-in functions are
connected to the wrong expanders because of copy-paste issues. These
tend not to be used anyway because the vec_st interface is friendlier,
but we should clean this up. Is that ok?
Thanks,
Bill
2016-04-25 Bill Schmidt <wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* rs6000-builtin.def: Correct pasto error for stxvd2x and stxvw4x
built-in functions.
Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.def
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.def (revision 235411)
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000-builtin.def (working copy)
@@ -1391,13 +1391,13 @@ BU_VSX_X (LXVW4X_V4SI, "lxvw4x_v4si", MEM)
BU_VSX_X (LXVW4X_V8HI, "lxvw4x_v8hi", MEM)
BU_VSX_X (LXVW4X_V16QI, "lxvw4x_v16qi", MEM)
BU_VSX_X (STXSDX, "stxsdx", MEM)
-BU_VSX_X (STXVD2X_V1TI, "stxsdx_v1ti", MEM)
-BU_VSX_X (STXVD2X_V2DF, "stxsdx_v2df", MEM)
-BU_VSX_X (STXVD2X_V2DI, "stxsdx_v2di", MEM)
-BU_VSX_X (STXVW4X_V4SF, "stxsdx_v4sf", MEM)
-BU_VSX_X (STXVW4X_V4SI, "stxsdx_v4si", MEM)
-BU_VSX_X (STXVW4X_V8HI, "stxsdx_v8hi", MEM)
-BU_VSX_X (STXVW4X_V16QI, "stxsdx_v16qi", MEM)
+BU_VSX_X (STXVD2X_V1TI, "stxvd2x_v1ti", MEM)
+BU_VSX_X (STXVD2X_V2DF, "stxvd2x_v2df", MEM)
+BU_VSX_X (STXVD2X_V2DI, "stxvd2x_v2di", MEM)
+BU_VSX_X (STXVW4X_V4SF, "stxvw4x_v4sf", MEM)
+BU_VSX_X (STXVW4X_V4SI, "stxvw4x_v4si", MEM)
+BU_VSX_X (STXVW4X_V8HI, "stxvw4x_v8hi", MEM)
+BU_VSX_X (STXVW4X_V16QI, "stxvw4x_v16qi", MEM)
BU_VSX_X (XSABSDP, "xsabsdp", CONST)
BU_VSX_X (XSADDDP, "xsadddp", FP)
BU_VSX_X (XSCMPODP, "xscmpodp", FP)
On Sun, 2016-04-24 at 15:52 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 02:06:47PM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > ISA 3.0 adds the lvxh8x, lvxb16x, stvxh8x, and stvxb16x instructions,
>
> lxvh8x etc. It looks like you only swapped things in this message,
> not in the actual patch :-)
>
> > (While working on this patch, I happened to notice that the existing
> > entries in rs6000-builtin.def for STXVD2X_<MODE> and STXVW4X_<MODE> are
> > mapped to stxsdx instead of stxvd2x/stxvw4x. I took the opportunity to
> > correct that as an obvious bug.)
>
> Does that part need backporting?
>
> Should the new builtins be documented?
>
> Looks fine otherwise.
>
>
> Segher
>
