On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Hurugalawadi, Naveen <naveen.hurugalaw...@caviumnetworks.com> wrote: > Hi, > >>> I'm also failing to see why you can't enhance the existing > > Please find attached the patch that enhances the existing pattern. > Please review the patch and let me know if any further modifications > are required.
What's the motivation of splitting this into a equal type (borken for the vector case) and a non-equal type case? Simply only allow nop-conversions here (tree_nop_conversion_p) and unconditionally emit (scmp (view_convert:newtype @0) (bit_not @1)) ? The conversion will be omitted if it turns out to be not necessary and a view_convert will be turned into a regular conversion for non-vector cases. Richard. > Thanks, > Naveen
