> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 05:50:53PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > Hi, > > as requested by Jakub, this patch makes devirtualization code to turn off > > transformations based on assumption that cxa_pure_virtual will never be > > called > > by a virtual call when -fsanitize=undefined is used. > > > > Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, will commit it shortly. > > > > PR ipa/66223 > > * ipa-devirt.c (maybe_record_node): Do not optimize cxa_pure_virtual > > calls when sanitizing. > > (possible_polymorphic_call_target_p)" FIx formating. > > > > * g++.dg/ipa/devirt-51.C: New testcase. > > Index: ipa-devirt.c > > =================================================================== > > --- ipa-devirt.c (revision 234715) > > +++ ipa-devirt.c (working copy) > > @@ -2438,10 +2438,14 @@ maybe_record_node (vec <cgraph_node *> & > > { > > gcc_assert (!target_node->global.inlined_to); > > gcc_assert (target_node->real_symbol_p ()); > > + /* When sanitizing, do not asume that cxa_pure_virutal is not called > > s/asume/assume/ > s/cxa/__cxa/ > s/virutal/virtual/ > > > + by valid program. */ > > + if (flag_sanitize & SANITIZE_UNDEFINED) > > + ; > > I'd use SANITIZE_UNREACHABLE instead, that is the sanitizer for > __builtin_unreachable (). Unless we want to split that into > -fsanitize=unreachable > -fsanitize=pure-virtual
Thanks. This is about case where we optimize undefined call (which would otherwise land in cxa_pure_virtual) into some other virtual method (that is the only resonable choice). I suppose UNREACHABLE makes sense here. I think I already commited the patch but I will update this. Honza > > Jakub