On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 10:02:44AM -0500, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Sorry again for the misunderstanding. Here are revised patches and
> change logs for trunk, GCC 5, and GCC 4.9. Note that GCC 5 and GCC 4.9
> have additional exposures in tree-ssa-math-opts.c that I've repaired
> similarly. The only differences between 5 and 4.9 are the names of the
> affected functions.
>
> All have passed regstrap on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu. Are these
> ok?
Yes, with small nits:
> +extern double pow (double __x, double __y) __attribute__ ((__nothrow__ ,
> __leaf__));
> +extern double __pow (double __x, double __y) __attribute__ ((__nothrow__ ,
> __leaf__));
No need for __pow prototype, you can also remove the __x and __y argument
names.
> +typedef int int64_t __attribute__ ((__mode__ (__DI__)));
Please remove the above typedef and just use:
> +
> +typedef struct {
> + int64_t data;
long long data;
here. Not sure if we support DImode on all targets, e.g. those with
32-bit BITS_PER_UNIT etc. (where DImode would be 256-bit integer).
Or just remove the data field altogether if it reproduces without it too.
Jakub
