On Mar 29, 2016, at 7:45 AM, David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> wrote: > We have no plans to make code generation a slave to the testsuite. > The testsuite is a tool, successful results from the testsuite is not > a goal unto itself. > > This patch is okay.
We look forward to the day when someone can find the time and energy and desire to make subsets of this work better and reenable those as they bring them back online. I view it as I do for turning off C++ testing on a PIC target, if no one wants to make it work nicely, then it is better to just turn it off. Anyone with the desire to make these tests work nicely will step forward and donate as they are able to. If someone would like that work done, you can edit up a TODO or projects file to describe the work you’d like done, and try and find someone that would like to do the work, or, just do the work yourself. If someone has the free time, and wants to tackle this project, merely step forward and let others know. This is how we make progress.
