On 03/23/2016 07:47 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Want me to re-word that? :-| I thought it would be obvious from looking
at the test case code; will not be a problem in practice. It's because
of constructs used in the test cases, like the following, for example:
if (__builtin_acc_on_device (5))
{
int g = 0, w = 0, v = 0;
__asm__ volatile ("mov.u32 %0,%%ctaid.x;" : "=r" (g));
__asm__ volatile ("mov.u32 %0,%%tid.y;" : "=r" (w));
__asm__ volatile ("mov.u32 %0,%%tid.x;" : "=r" (v));
ary[ix] = (g << 16) | (w << 8) | v;
Ok, maybe write "This code uses nvptx assembly guarded with
__builtin_acc_on_device, which fails to be optimized away at -O0."
Ok with something like that.
Bernd
