On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Tom de Vries <tom_devr...@mentor.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Atm, using fdump-tree-all-graph produces invalid dot files:
> ...
> $ rm *.c.* ; gcc test.c -O2 -S -fdump-tree-all-graph
> $ for f in *.dot; do dot -Tpdf $f -o dot.pdf; done
> Warning: test.c.006t.omplower.dot: syntax error in line 1 near '}'
> Warning: test.c.007t.lower.dot: syntax error in line 1 near '}'
> Warning: test.c.010t.eh.dot: syntax error in line 1 near '}'
> Warning: test.c.292t.statistics.dot: syntax error in line 1 near '}'
> $ cat test.c.006t.omplower.dot
> }
> $
> ...
> These dot files are finalized, but never initialized or used.
>
> The 006/007/010 files are not used because '(fn->curr_properties & PROP_cfg)
> == 0' at the corresponding passes.
>
> And the file test.c.292t.statistics.dot is not used, because it doesn't
> belong to a single pass.
>
> The current finalization code doesn't handle these cases:
> ...
> /* Do whatever is necessary to finish printing the graphs. */
> for (i = TDI_end; (dfi = dumps->get_dump_file_info (i)) != NULL; ++i)
> if (dumps->dump_initialized_p (i)
> && (dfi->pflags & TDF_GRAPH) != 0
> && (name = dumps->get_dump_file_name (i)) != NULL)
> {
> finish_graph_dump_file (name);
> free (name);
> }
> ...
>
> The patch fixes this by simply testing for pass->graph_dump_initialized
> instead.
>
> [ That fix exposes the lack of initialization of graph_dump_initialized. It
> seems to be initialized for static passes, but for dynamically added passes,
> such as f.i. vzeroupper the value is uninitialized. The patch also fixes
> this. ]
>
> Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
>
> OK for stage1?
Seeing this I wonder if it makes more sense to move ->graph_dump_initialized
from pass to dump_file_info? Also in the above shouldn't it use
dfi->pfilename rather than dumps->get_dump_file_name (i)?
Richard.
> Thanks,
> - Tom
