On Wed, 17 Aug 2011, Artem Shinkarov wrote:
> +For the convenience condition in the vector conditional can be just a
> +vector of signed integer type. In that case this vector is implicitly
> +compared with vectors of zeroes. Consider an example:
Where is this bit tested in the testcases added?
> + if (TREE_CODE (type1) != VECTOR_TYPE
> + || TREE_CODE (type2) != VECTOR_TYPE)
> + {
> + error_at (colon_loc, "vector comparisom arguments must be of "
> + "type vector");
"comparison"
> + /* Avoid C_MAYBE_CONST in VEC_COND_EXPR. */
> + sc = c_fully_fold (ifexp, false, &maybe_const);
> + sc = save_expr (sc);
> + if (!maybe_const)
> + ifexp = c_wrap_maybe_const (sc, true);
> + else
> + ifexp = sc;
This looks like it's duplicating c_save_expr; that is, like "ifexp =
c_save_expr (ifexp);" would suffice.
But, it's not clear that it actually achieves the effect described in the
comment; have you actually tried with function calls, assignments etc. in
the operands? The code in build_binary_op uses save_expr rather than
c_save_expr because it does some intermediate operations before calling
c_wrap_maybe_const, and if you really want to avoid C_MAYBE_CONST in
VEC_COND_EXPR then you'll need to continue calling save_expr, as here, but
delay the call to c_wrap_maybe_const so that the whole VEC_COND_EXPR is
wrapped if required.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
