On March 16, 2016 3:17:20 AM GMT+01:00, "H.J. Lu" <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Where is the current definition of empty types you're proposing for >use in >> GCC? Is the behavior of this case clear from that definition? > >https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-03/msg00071.html > >Jason's patch follows it. Here is a test for struct with zero-size >array of empty type, which is treated as empty type. index 0000000..489eb3a --- /dev/null +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/abi/empty19.C @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +// PR c++/60336 +// { dg-do run } +// { dg-options "-Wabi=9 -x c" } +// { dg-additional-sources "empty14a.c" } 14a ? Not 19a ? Thanks
