On 09/03/16 16:57, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: > On 08/03/16 14:56, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >> Hi Andre, >> >> On 08/03/16 11:05, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: >>> On 03/03/16 11:28, Kyrill Tkachov wrote: >>>> Hi Andre, >>>> >>>> On 02/03/16 12:21, Andre Vieira (lists) wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Tests used to check for "r8" which will not work because cortex-r8 >>>>> string is now included in the assembly. Fixed by checking for >>>>> "[^\-]r8". >>>>> >>>>> Is this Ok? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Andre >>>>> >>>>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: >>>>> >>>>> 2016-03-02 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com> >>>>> >>>>> * gcc.target/arm/pr45701-1.c: Change assembler scan to not >>>>> trigger for cortex-r8, when scanning for register r8. >>>>> * gcc.target/arm/pr45701-2.c: Likewise. >>>> Ok. >>>> Thanks, >>>> Kyrill >>>> >>> Thomas commited on my behalf at revision r234040. >>> >>> Had to rebase arm-tune.md and invoke.texi, these were all obvious >>> changes. >> >> I'm seeing a DejaGNU error while testing >> RUNTESTFLAGS="arm.exp=pr45701-*.c": >> ERROR: (DejaGnu) proc "^-" does not exist. >> The error code is NONE >> The info on the error is: >> invalid command name "^-" >> while executing >> "::tcl_unknown ^-" >> ("uplevel" body line 1) >> invoked from within >> "uplevel 1 ::tcl_unknown $args" >> >> That's due to the scan-assembler-not test: >> /* { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "[^\-]r8" } } */ >> >> The '[' and ']' need to be escaped by a backslash. >> Can you please post a patch to add the escapes. >> Sorry for missing this in the original review... >> >> Kyrill >> >>> Cheers, >>> Andre >>> >> > Hi there, > > Sorry for missing those too. > > 2016-03-09 Andre Vieira <andre.simoesdiasvie...@arm.com> > > * gcc.target/arm/pr45701-1.c: Escape brackets. > * gcc.target/arm/pr45701-2.c: Likewise. > Hi,
We decided to apply the following patch to the ARM embedded 5 branch. Best regards, Andre