On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Jason Merrill <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On this testcase, when strip_typedefs rebuilds a TYPENAME_TYPE to remove the
> typedef, in this case it looks up the same typedef and we then abort because
> we still have a typedef.  In that case, strip the typedef explicitly.
>
> Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk and 5.

I checked this into trunk for:

ERROR: g++.dg/template/typename21.C  -std=c++11: syntax error in
target selector "target c++98" for " dg-do 2 compile { target c++98 }
"
ERROR: g++.dg/template/typename21.C  -std=c++14: syntax error in
target selector "target c++98" for " dg-do 2 compile { target c++98 }
"
ERROR: g++.dg/template/typename21.C  -std=c++98: syntax error in
target selector "target c++98" for " dg-do 2 compile { target c++98 }
"

Will backport to 5 if needed.

-- 
H.J.
Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
--- ChangeLog (revision 233974)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2016-03-04  H.J. Lu  <hongjiu...@intel.com>
+
+ * g++.dg/template/typename21.C: Replace c++98 with c++98_only.
+
 2016-03-04  David Malcolm  <dmalc...@redhat.com>

  PR c/68187
Index: g++.dg/template/typename21.C
===================================================================
--- g++.dg/template/typename21.C (revision 233974)
+++ g++.dg/template/typename21.C (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 // PR c++/70067
-// { dg-do compile { target c++98 } }
+// { dg-do compile { target c++98_only } }

 template <class> struct A;
 template <class T> struct B { struct N { }; };

Reply via email to