Hi Markus, Hi Richard,

  PR 70044 reports a problem with the AArch64 backend.  With LTO enabled
  the function aarch64_override_options_after_change can be called more
  than once for the same function.  If only leaf frame pointers were
  being omitted originally, then the first call will set
  flag_omit_frame_pointer to true.  Then the second call will set
  flag_omit_leaf_frame_pointer to false, thus forcing the frame pointer
  to always be omitted, contrary to the original settings of these
  flags.

  The attached patch fixes this problem by setting
  flag_omit_frame_pointer to true, but using a special value of 2 to do
  so.  Then when the second call occurs we can detect this case and
  ensure that we do not set flag_omit_leaf_frame_pointer to false.

  Tested with no regressions on an aarch64-elf toolchain.

  OK to apply ?

Cheers
  Nick

gcc/ChangeLog
2016-03-04  Nick Clifton  <ni...@redhat.com>

        PR target/7044
        * config/aarch64/aarch64.c
        (aarch64_override_options_after_change_1): When forcing
        flag_omit_frame_pointer to be true, use a special value that can
        be detected if this function is called again, thus preventing
        flag_omit_leaf_frame_pointer from being forced to be false.

Index: gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c
===================================================================
--- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c	(revision 233960)
+++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.c	(working copy)
@@ -8110,6 +8110,21 @@
 static void
 aarch64_override_options_after_change_1 (struct gcc_options *opts)
 {
+  /* The logic here is that if we are disabling all frame pointer generation
+     then we do not need to disable leaf frame pointer generation as a
+     separate operation.  But if we are *only* disabling leaf frame pointer
+     generation then we set flag_omit_frame_pointer to true, but in
+     aarch64_frame_pointer_required we return false only for leaf functions.
+
+     PR 70044: We have to be careful about being called multiple times for the
+     same function.  Once we have decided to set flag_omit_frame_pointer just
+     so that we can omit leaf frame pointers, we must then not interpret a
+     second call as meaning that all frame pointer generation should be
+     omitted.  We do this by setting flag_omit_frame_pointer to a special,
+     non-zero value.  */
+  if (opts->x_flag_omit_frame_pointer == 2)
+    opts->x_flag_omit_frame_pointer = 0;
+
   if (opts->x_flag_omit_frame_pointer)
     opts->x_flag_omit_leaf_frame_pointer = false;
   else if (opts->x_flag_omit_leaf_frame_pointer)

Reply via email to