On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Bernd Schmidt <bschm...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 02/24/2016 11:01 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> >> As Vlad noted, the test is definitely a pathological case. I think >> Bernd's patch is a very reasonable approach to address the current >> problem. Namely that LRA can be making progress on a pathological >> testcase, but it gets terminated by the anti-looping clamp. The clamp >> itself was put in place to catch bugs in LRA or ports that are in the >> process of converting to LRA. > > > Richard, are you upholding your objection?
No. Richard. > > Bernd >
