On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Andreas Schwab <sch...@redhat.com> wrote: > Liang Wang <netcas...@gmail.com> writes: > >> #define ggc_alloc_rtvec_sized(NELT) \ >> - (ggc_alloc_zone_vec_rtvec_def (sizeof (rtx), \ >> - sizeof (struct rtvec_def) + ((NELT) - >> 1), \ >> + (ggc_alloc_zone_vec_rtvec_def (1, \ >> + sizeof (struct rtvec_def) \ >> + + ((NELT) - 1) * sizeof (rtx), \ > > ggc_alloc_zone_vec_rtvec_def is for allocating an array of rtvec_def, > but you want a single (variable sized) rtvec_def, so > ggc_alloc_zone_rtvec_def is the correct function to call.
I'm not so sure about that given the more strongly typing of our allocators. Laurynas? Thanks, Richard. > Andreas. > > -- > Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com > GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E > "And now for something completely different." >
