On 2016.02.25 at 11:01 +0100, Martin Liška wrote: > On 02/17/2016 04:01 PM, Martin Liška wrote: > > On 02/17/2016 03:23 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> "has been" looks weird. I'd say that the C++ compiler is now more > >> aggressive... > >> > I've been thinking if the suggested patch makes sense any longer after > the following patch was applied: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg01651.html ?
It still makes sense, just replace -fno-lifetime-dse with -fno-lifetime-dse=1. -- Markus
