On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> While we ignore -Wunreachable-code option now, as we require
> that GCC diagnostic options are CL_WARNING only, we should remember
> that this is a former Warning option (similarly for -Werror=).
>
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
Ok.
Richard.
> 2016-02-22 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
>
> PR c/69900
> * common.opt (Wunreachable-code): Add Warning flag.
>
> * gcc.dg/pr69900.c: New test.
>
> --- gcc/common.opt.jj 2016-02-16 21:43:38.000000000 +0100
> +++ gcc/common.opt 2016-02-22 12:16:53.393949080 +0100
> @@ -728,7 +728,7 @@ Common Var(warn_maybe_uninitialized) War
> Warn about maybe uninitialized automatic variables.
>
> Wunreachable-code
> -Common Ignore
> +Common Ignore Warning
> Does nothing. Preserved for backward compatibility.
>
> Wunused
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69900.c.jj 2016-02-22 12:29:22.177681519 +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69900.c 2016-02-22 12:29:09.000000000 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
> +/* PR c/69900 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic error "-Wunreachable-code" /* { dg-bogus "is not
> an option that controls warnings" } */
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic warning "-Wunreachable-code" /* { dg-bogus "is not
> an option that controls warnings" } */
> +#pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wunreachable-code" /* { dg-bogus "is not
> an option that controls warnings" } */
>
> Jakub
