On 02/22/16 14:35, Aaron Conole wrote:
D'oh, you're probably right. In my excitement to contribute, I forgot this was shared. I think 'w' should be correct, since this isn't intended to be read at all, but I could be convinced otherwise.
sorry, I misremembered the encoding of write append, which is "a" -- don't clobber the existing contents. I think that's the usual behaviour for error logging (.xsession-error and the like).
By lazy load, do you mean only after the first gcov_error call? That's probably a better approach, and I can recook, test, and resubmit with these corrected.
Lazy opening -- open on first error output. Something like if (!gcov_error_file) gcov_error_file = gcov_open_error_file (); in gcov_error? FWIW, I think this has missed the boat for gcc 6.1, as we're now in stage 4. nathan -- Nathan Sidwell
